Me: "To hide in cherry trees." You: RRRR! Me: "Have you ever seen one elephant in a cherry tree?" You: "No." Me: "See? it works!" I"ve always wondered about this.


Comments

*

Citizen Irrelevant writes:

This question strikes me as (1) frivolous or trite; or (2) one infantilization the this forum. There space myriad real-world examples of fallacies broadcast everyday in the MSM, which space worthy the deconstructing: this cartoonish submission, just an absurd exercise.


posted top top Thursday, Mar 05, 2020 10:40:24 am
< login to reply > posted on Thursday, Mar 05, 2020 02:23:59 pm

Bryan writes:

How about if it"s rephrased:

Crystals stop cancer.

I"ve worn crystals for years and also I"ve never developed cancer.


< login to reply > post on Thursday, Mar 05, 2020 04:13:23 afternoon
*

Bo Bennett, PhD writes:

Another TOO typical real civilization example of this:

If trump card was chosen by God, he would certainly be a flawed human (like other flawed world in the holy bible that God determined to do his bidding).

Trump is absolutely a flawed person.

Therefore, this is proof that trump was liked by God.


< login to answer > posted on Friday, Mar 06, 2020 10:04:05 to be
*

*

Bo Bennett, PhD writes:

We"re every flawed, not just Trump.

You are watching: Why do elephants paint their toenails red

Theologically, all human beings are flawed, so having to to speak "God chooses flawed people" makes just as lot sense as "God chooses person people." You room using Equivocation here. In the context of the argument, "flawed" is no "non-perfection;" that is more like "morally deficient."


DrBill
writes:

Well, gee, it was your usage of "flawed" that i relied upon because that accepting her premise. If you supposed Trump, in the context of the argument, to be "morally deficient" it was your equivocation, no mine, once you said "flawed" rather of "morally deficient".


Deborah
writes:

I understand my question was just plain silly. I"m pretty new here, and also I didn"t realize that feeling is taken into consideration inappropriate in this forum. How about this: "Why execute you take aspirin every day?" "Because I get a most headaches." "Have you ever gone a work without taking aspirin?" "I go once, and also I gained a headache. The proves that works."


Want to obtain notified of all inquiries as they space asked? upgrade your letter preferences and also turn ~ above "Instant Notification."


Hello! ns am social psychologist and also author, Bo Bennett. In this podcast, ns take a vital thinking-, reason-, and science-based approach to problems that matter. Together of January 2020, this podcast is a arsenal of topics associated to every one of my books. Subscribe today and enjoy!

*
*


Aside native the comment given, friend can also see it as affirming the consequent.

If X hides in a cherry tree, then X won"t be seen.

We cannot check out X.

Therefore, X hides in a cherry tree.


This details example appears to be a clear joke / irony, for this reason no fallacies. However, I have seen comparable lines of "reasoning" that are meant to be serious. First, there is Begging the Question (elephant"s don"t repaint their nails). Second, the "to hide in cherry trees" prize is factually incorrect. Third, the reality that we haven"t seen an elephant hiding in a cherry tree doesn"t typical the reason provided for why is sustained by the truth (false reason / Non Sequitur ).


answered on Wednesday, Mar 04, 2020 06:05:08 am by Bo Bennett, doctor

Bo Bennett, PhD suggested These Categories


You (Me:) space assuming that since you can"t prove who wrong, they are right. This is the proving Non-Existence Fallacy.

Proving Non-Existence


Tami writes:

As Bo said, clearly this is a joke. However, thanks for your post. Some civilization make statements the sound similar to this, that should be jokes, however are not. So, there is still something come learn around fallacy native the Bo"s answer, and perhaps rather that may follow. :D


You have actually one or more errors in this form. After girlfriend close this notice, you re welcome scroll through this form and exactly the particular errors.


Logically Fallacious

The book, Logically Fallacious, is a crash course, supposed to catapult you into a civilization where you begin to watch things how they yes, really are, not just how you think castle are. The emphasis of this publication is on reasonable fallacies, which loose defined, are simply errors in reasoning. Through the analysis of each page, you have the right to make far-ranging improvements in the method you reason and make decisions.

See more: Difference Between Romanesque And Gothic Architecture, Romanesque And Gothic Architecture


academic Edition

The scholastic edition was released top top November 22, 2013. Just like the an initial edition, it has over 300 reasonable fallacies v over 500 thorough examples. The academic edition to be edited utilizing APA format and also the examples were checked to be much more suitable for academic environments.